Carry back of surplus ACT and the order in which claims are to be given effect to – s.239(3) ICTA 1988.Decision of Ferris J reversed. The taxpayers were entitled to have their claims to carry back surplus ACT in respect of different accounting periods given effect to in the order in which the claims were made. The taxpayers made claims pursuant to s.239(3) ICTA 1988 to carry back surplus ACT in respect of a particular accounting period and then subsequently made claims to carry back surplus ACT in respect of an earlier accounting period. The taxpayers required effect to be given to the earlier claim in respect of the later accounting period before the later claim in respect of the earlier accounting period. The Revenue contended that the claims should be given effect to in the chronological order of the accounting periods. Held: the taxpayers were entitled to effect being given to their claims in the order in which they were made.Lord Goldsmith KC and David Goy KC appeared for the taxpayers
Carr (HMIT) v. Armpledge Ltd – Carr (HMIT) v. Fielden & Ashworth Ltd – unreported as yet
Latest news:
Nicola Shaw KC wins Tax Silk of the Year at Legal 500 UK Bar Awards
Nicola Shaw KC has been awarded the Tax Silk of the Year
30 Sep 2024
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers is delighted to have been shortlisted for Tax Set of the Year and Nicola Shaw KC for Tax Silk of the Year in this year’s Chambers UK Bar Awards 2024.
The rankings and shortlist are the result of extensive research and thousands of interviews conducted by Chambers and Partners.
23 Aug 2024
GITC Review
The 2022 GITC Review is now available
If you would like to be added to the mailing list for future issues of the GITC Review, please send an email to Jane.Fullbrook@taxbar.com.