36 Queen Street, London, EC4R 1BN | +44 (0)20 7242 2642
John Gerald Gray (t/a William Gray & Sons) v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise – Chancery Division

The issue in this case was whether one is required to use a forward looking approach to taxable turnover under paragraph 1(3) Schedule 1 VATA 1994 or use the benefit of hindsight. Both the Tribunal and the High Court took the view that a forward looking approach only was permissible. The High Court explained that to allow a taxpayer who failed to comply with the unequivocal rules set out in Schedule 1 of VATA 1994 would be to put that taxpayer in a better position than a taxpayer who had properly complied with all those obligations. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed.

Hugh McKay (instructed by HM Customs & Excise) for the Respondents

Latest news:

Ben Blades joins Chambers
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers are delighted to announce that Ben Blades has accepted offers of tenancy with us.
03 Apr 2022
Michael Jones was appointed Queen’s Counsel
Following his successful application for Silk, Michael was formally appointed in 2021.
18 Dec 2020
GITC Review
The 2021 GITC Review is now available
If you would like to be added to the mailing list for future issues of the GITC Review, please send a fax to (+44)(0)20 7831 9017 or an email to the Senior Clerk.
Read review