This appeal concerned the interaction of s.17 (market value rule), s.28 (timing rule) and s.144(3) (single transaction rule on the exercise of options) Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The taxpayer had been granted share options as a result of his employment outside the United Kingdom and had later exercised those options when he became United Kingdom resident. The issue was whether, as the Revenue said, the taxpayer’s base cost should be the market value of the option at the time of the grant plus the amount actually paid for the exercise of the option (which gave a lower base cost) or, as the taxpayer argued, the market value of the shares at the time that the option was granted. The Court of Appeal, upholding the High Court and Special Commissoners, said that the taxpayer’s arguments were correct.Tmothy Brennan KC and Hugh McKay appeared for the Appellant
Mansworth (HM Inspector of Taxes) v. Jelley – Court of Appeal
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers is deeply saddened to learn of the death of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
We join the nation in mourning and our condolences are with the Royal Family.
09 Sep 2022
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers has been nominated in the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2022
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers are delighted to have been have been nominated for Tax Set of the Year.
31 Aug 2022
The 2022 GITC Review is now available
If you would like to be added to the mailing list for future issues of the GITC Review, please send an email to Jane.Fullbrook@taxbar.com.