Notices requiring a third party to produce documents, issued by the Inland Revenue during tax investigations. s.20(3) TMA 1970.The draft notices issued by the Revenue in this case were permitted by s.20(8A) TMA since although the documents requested were conjectural and described only in general terms, nevertheless they were described in the notices within the meaning of s.20(8D) TMA; furthermore the requirement for the consent of the Special Commissioner under s.20(8A) provided a sufficient safeguard against the misuse of the Revenue’s power in this regard.R v. O’Kane and Clarke, ex p. Northern Bank Ltd disapproved in partDavid Goldberg KC appeared for the taxpayerPetition for leave to appeal to House of Lords refused
R v. IRC, ex p. Ulster Bank Ltd [1997] STC 832 (C.A.)
Latest news:
Harry Winter promoted to B Panel and Ben Blades appointed to C Panel
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers are delighted to announce that Harry Winter has been promoted to the Attorney General’s B Panel and Ben Blades has been appointed on the London C Panel.
29 Jul 2026
Share exchanges: just and reasonable adjustments
New legislation rewrites share exchange anti-avoidance rules
29 Apr 2026
GITC Review
Previous issues of the GITC Review are available under the ‘Articles’ Section of this website.

