36 Queen Street, London, EC4R 1BN | +44 (0)20 7242 2642
R. v. Special Commissioner of Income Tax ex parte CIR AND R v. CIR ex parte Ulster Bank Ltd – [2000] STC 537 (QBD)

This is an astonishing decision. It decides that a role apparently given to the Board of Inland Revenue can be performed by a generally authorised officer who is not a member of the Board. The point arose in the context of notices which can be served under s.20 of the Taxes Management Act and undermines the apparent safeguards in the section for notices given by the Board. The issue in this case is similar to that in ex parte Davis Frankel Mead (QB). An appeal has been lodged against this part of the decision.The good thing about Ulster Bank is that the Revenue made an agreement not to apply for consent to issue a notice after a certain date. They were held bound by this agreement. This is a most important and encouraging development even if the Judgement is somewhat grudging about the achievement.David Goldberg KC and Clive Lewis appeared for Ulster Bank Limited

Latest news:

Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers is delighted to announce that Nicholas Macklam has joined Chambers.
18 Jun 2024
Tolleys Taxation Awards 2024
We are pleased to announce that we have won the Tolleys Taxation Awards 2024 for Tax Chambers of the Year.
28 May 2024
GITC Review
The 2022 GITC Review is now available
If you would like to be added to the mailing list for future issues of the GITC Review, please send an email to Jane.Fullbrook@taxbar.com.
Read review