36 Queen Street, London, EC4R 1BN | +44 (0)20 7242 2642
R. v. Special Commissioner of Income Tax ex parte CIR AND R v. CIR ex parte Ulster Bank Ltd – [2000] STC 537 (QBD)

This is an astonishing decision. It decides that a role apparently given to the Board of Inland Revenue can be performed by a generally authorised officer who is not a member of the Board. The point arose in the context of notices which can be served under s.20 of the Taxes Management Act and undermines the apparent safeguards in the section for notices given by the Board. The issue in this case is similar to that in ex parte Davis Frankel Mead (QB). An appeal has been lodged against this part of the decision.The good thing about Ulster Bank is that the Revenue made an agreement not to apply for consent to issue a notice after a certain date. They were held bound by this agreement. This is a most important and encouraging development even if the Judgement is somewhat grudging about the achievement.David Goldberg KC and Clive Lewis appeared for Ulster Bank Limited

Latest news:

Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers is delighted to have been shortlisted for 4 separate awards at The Legal 500 Bar Awards 2023
19 Jul 2023
GITC is sad to report the death of our Head of Chambers, Mr Milton Grundy who passed away at the weekend.
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers is deeply saddened by the passing of our founding member and Head of Chambers, Mr Milton Grundy
28 Nov 2022
GITC Review
The 2022 GITC Review is now available
If you would like to be added to the mailing list for future issues of the GITC Review, please send an email to Jane.Fullbrook@taxbar.com.
Read review