The issue in this appeal is first whether there should be an apportionment for the provision of services consisting of the supply of telephone equipment and photocopying services from the supply of office accommodation under a tenancy agreement. If the supply is a separate supply of services, the issue arises whether it is supplied for consideration during the rent and service charge-free period under the tenancy agreement. Appeal dismissed in relation to the telephone equipment and allowed in relation to the photocopying services.Nicola Shaw, instructed by Field Fisher Waterhouse, appeared for the Appellant
Tower Hamlets Housing Action Trust v. CCE – VAT Tribunal
Latest news:
Harry Winter promoted to B Panel and Ben Blades appointed to C Panel
Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers are delighted to announce that Harry Winter has been promoted to the Attorney General’s B Panel and Ben Blades has been appointed on the London C Panel.
29 Jul 2026
Share exchanges: just and reasonable adjustments
New legislation rewrites share exchange anti-avoidance rules
29 Apr 2026
GITC Review
Previous issues of the GITC Review are available under the ‘Articles’ Section of this website.

